March Madness, is it Good or Bad?

March Madness, is it Good or Bad?
Brady Callen

March Madness. When most people hear those two words, they instantly think basketball, but what a lot of people don't think about, is how much of a distraction the games are. Everywhere, from  high  schools  to  the  workplace,  people  will  be  watching  basketball  games  on  TVs, smartphones, and tablets. As for  schools that may just be something else to distract kids that already  aren’t  paying  attention, and might  not have the big of an effect. But in the workplace, March Madness creates a huge negative externality.

All over the country Americans will be watching in place of working, which is bad right? Maybe not.  Although  lost  wages  are  estimated  to  be around $1.2 billion for each unproductive hour, according to the consultant firm Challenger, Gray, & Christmas, there are positive outcomes of the  games.  March  Madness  can  increase  morale  among  workers,  as  their teams do  better. Seeing your team prevail, or even just watching them play whether they win or not in the end can inspire  you  to work more, and better.  It can also  be a way for employees to bond. Assuming workers in one business cheer for the same team, they find similarities and work better together after the games. Going through the three weeks knowing that someone  else is hoping for the same team to win allows you to connect with that person, which will then let you work better with them later. So after the inevitable decrease in productivity, there can perhaps be an increase that surpasses what it was in February for example. This positive externality is a nice counter to the negative one more commonly thought of.

Then  there’s  also  things  like  sportswear  sales,  tournament  ticket  sales, hotels, and possibly even increased sales of TV’s to watch the games.
(graph)http://www.statista.com/statistics/219655/ncaa­basketball­tournament­games­ticket­sale
s/

As you can see, not only do  ticket  sales  create a  lot of revenue, but the amount is also rising every year. Television revenue from the games is also rising from about $400 million ten years ago to about $684 million last year. If the increase stays relatively constant, in another ten years that  number  could  be  close  to $1.2 dollars.  The revenue generated from just  television could equal lost wages of companies.

As  the  games  begin,  so  does  the  distraction  from  work  and  school,  and  so  does  the  team bonding between workers. Who will you be cheering on?

Bibliography:
● "Is March Madness Really Good for the Economy?." SmallBusiness. N.p., n.d. Web. 18
Mar. 2014.
<http://smallbusiness.aol.com/2011/03/15/is­march­madness­actually­good­for­the­econ
omy/>.● "March Madness Could Cost Employers $1.2B." Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc..
N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Mar. 2014.
<http://www.challengergray.com/press/press­releases/march­madness­could­cost­empl
oyers­12b>
● "NCAA college basketball tournament TV/television revenue 2013." Statista. N.p., n.d.
Web. 18 Mar. 2014.
<http://www.statista.com/statistics/287522/ncaa­basketball­tournament­television­revenu
e/>.
● "NCAA college basketball tournament revenue from ticket sales 2013." Statista. N.p., n.d.
Web. 18 Mar. 2014.
<http://www.statista.com/statistics/219655/ncaa­basketball­tournament­games­ticket­sal
es/>.
● "The New Republic." New Republic. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Mar. 2014.
<http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117045/economic­costs­and­benefits­college­bask
etball­ncaa­tournament>.

0 Response to "March Madness, is it Good or Bad?"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel